Monday June 5th (Week 3 of 8) | |||||||
UnderBold means two games this day | |||||||
Crew Chief | Referee | Time | Location | Home Team | Visitor Team | ||
Location (Beaverton): 9685 SW Harvest Ct | |||||||
Duilio-Mikal | JordanBlack | 8:15 PM | @ Beaverton Hoop Ct #1 | CTR | vs | 3 & D (WED) | |
Ballard-Jalen | JordanBlack | 9:10 PM | @ Beaverton Hoop Ct #1 | CTR | vs | Ruthless | |
Ken Vaughn | JeffHadden | 8:15 PM | @ Beaverton Hoop Ct #4 | Robs Real Estate | vs | The Variants | |
Ken Vaughn | JeffHadden | 9:10 PM | @ Beaverton Hoop Ct #4 | Picket Fence (Intel) | vs | Day Drinkers | |
TroyMiller | KennySmith | 8:15 PM | @ Beaverton Hoop Ct #5 | Circuit Breakerz (Intel) | vs | Hoop De Hoop (Intel) | |
TroyMiller | KennySmith | 9:10 PM | @ Beaverton Hoop Ct #5 | The Fab Five (Intel) | vs | Chip City (Intel) | |
FrazierDantea | RichardBriggs | 8:15 PM | @ Beaverton Hoop Ct #6 | 5 guys hoops and drives | vs | Indy We're Gonna Need a Bigger Bol | |
FrazierDantea | RichardBriggs | 9:10 PM | @ Beaverton Hoop Ct #6 | CompView | vs | Indy Return to Senden | |
Location (Portland): 205 NE 92nd Ave | |||||||
Burns-T | DuilioMikal | 6:00 PM | Columbia Christian School (50) | Alberta Park | vs | McLoughlin Middies | |
Burns-T | Dorrance-Caleb | 6:50 PM | Columbia Christian School (50) | Undetermined | vs | Indy Rick Adelman | |
Burns-T | Dorrance-Caleb | 7:40 PM | Columbia Christian School (50) | GD Tigers | vs | Calvin and friends | |
Burns-T | CiarraFord | 8:35 PM | Columbia Christian School (50) | Like Ja | vs | The Wettersons | |
Burns-T | CiarraFord/Duilio | 9:30 PM | Columbia Christian School (40) | Ankle Takers | vs | The Wettersons | |
Location (Portland) 653 NW Culpepper Terrace | |||||||
RobertBartow | AnthonyWilson | 6:05 PM | @ Hillside Community Center | Full Court Mess | vs | Lady Hoopsters | |
RobertBartow | AnthonyWilson | 6:55 PM | @ Hillside Community Center | Big Worms | vs | Lady Hoopsters | |
AnthonyWilson | Matt Floyd | 7:50 PM | @ Hillside Community Center | Moore Bucketz (Intel) | vs | Ronler Achers (Intel) | |
RobertBartow | Matt Floyd | 8:45 PM | @ Hillside Community Center | The Decline (Intel) | vs | Sun Blazers (Intel) | |
RobertBartow | Matt Floyd | 9:35 PM | @ Hillside Community Center | HodgePodge (Intel) | vs | Beast Node (Intel) | |
Location (Portland): 6800 SE Division Street | |||||||
MarkNelson | KashiasLewis | 7:05 PM | @ Warner Pacific College (48) | Will Pay Tomorrow #1 | vs | Al's Gators | |
MarkNelson | KashiasLewis | 8:00 PM | @ Warner Pacific College (48) | Will Pay Tomorrow #1 | vs | Team Friendship | |
MarkNelson | KashiasLewis | 8:55 PM | @ Warner Pacific College (48) | Gresham Terminators | vs | Dre's Doggs | |
Monday Spring 2 Women's Division | |||||||||||
Day | Team | W | L2 | W% | AVG PF | AVG PA | AVG DIFF | STR OF SCHED | STREAK | RANK PTS | |
1 | Mon | Big Worms | 2 | 0 | 1.00 | 69 | 52 | 17 | 0.00 | W2 | 36.04 |
2 | Mon | Full Court Mess | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 48 | 73 | 26 | 2.50 | L2 | 26.79 |
3 | Mon | Lady Hoopsters | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 52 | 70 | 18 | 3.00 | L1 | 27.65 |
4 | Mon | Indy Lady Golden Flash | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | FALSE | 0.00 |
Monday Spring 2 League Rankings | |||||||||||
Day | Team | W | L2 | W% | AVG PF | AVG PA | AVG DIFF | STR OF SCHED | STREAK | RANK PTS | |
1 | Mon | Gresham Terminators | 1 | 0 | 1.00 | 67 | 55 | 12 | 2.00 | W1 | 38.84 |
2 | Mon | Ankle Takers | 1 | 0 | 1.00 | 68 | 67 | 1 | 0.00 | W1 | 36.67 |
3 | Mon | Calvin and friends | 2 | 0 | 1.00 | 95 | 75 | 20 | 0.00 | W2 | 36.40 |
4 | Mon | Robs Real Estate | 1 | 0 | 1.00 | 94 | 80 | 14 | 0.00 | W1 | 36.31 |
5 | Mon | Indy Return to Senden | 1 | 0 | 1.00 | 80 | 70 | 10 | 0.00 | W1 | 36.06 |
6 | Mon | Al's Gators | 1 | 0 | 1.00 | 70 | 59 | 11 | 0.00 | W1 | 35.92 |
7 | Mon | Team Friendship | 1 | 1 | 0.50 | 73 | 73 | 12 | 3.00 | W1 | 34.29 |
8 | Mon | Alberta Park | 1 | 1 | 0.50 | 79 | 82 | 13 | 2.50 | L1 | 33.63 |
9 | Mon | Indy Rick Adelman | 1 | 1 | 0.50 | 75 | 72 | 15 | 1.00 | W1 | 31.40 |
10 | Mon | 5 guys hoops and drives | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 76 | 87 | 11 | 4.00 | L2 | 29.73 |
11 | Mon | McLoughlin Middies | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 80 | 97 | 17 | 4.00 | L2 | 29.73 |
12 | Mon | CompView | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 63 | 69 | 6 | 4.00 | L2 | 29.71 |
13 | Mon | Indy We're Gonna Need a Bigger Bol | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 80 | 82 | 2 | 2.00 | L1 | 27.27 |
14 | Mon | GD Tigers | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 54 | 72 | 18 | 2.00 | L1 | 26.22 |
15 | Mon | Dre's Doggs | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | -- | 0.00 |
16 | Mon | Indy Bob Whitsitt (West P2P) | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | -- | 0.00 |
17 | Mon | Indy Vancouver | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | -- | 0.00 |
18 | Mon | Undetermined | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | -- | 0.00 |
Spring Intel Division | |||||||||||
Spring 1 Record | |||||||||||
Day | Team | W | L2 | W% | AVG PF | AVG PA | AVG DIFF | STR OF SCHED | STREAK | RANK PTS | |
1 | Sat | Picket Fence (Intel) | 5 | 1 | 0.83 | 66 | 52 | 17 | 1.58 | W4 | 36.52 |
2 | Sat | The Decline (Intel) | 4 | 2 | 0.67 | 61 | 60 | 10 | 1.58 | L2 | 34.48 |
3 | Sat | Ronler Achers (Intel) | 4 | 2 | 0.67 | 68 | 58 | 17 | 1.50 | L1 | 34.38 |
4 | Sat | Moore Bucketz (Intel) | 4 | 2 | 0.67 | 57 | 54 | 15 | 1.33 | W4 | 33.93 |
5 | Sat | Circuit Breakerz (Intel) | 3 | 3 | 0.50 | 63 | 57 | 9 | 1.75 | L1 | 32.88 |
6 | Sat | Sun Blazers (Intel) | 3 | 3 | 0.50 | 50 | 58 | 18 | 1.50 | W1 | 31.84 |
7 | Sat | HodgePodge (Intel) | 3 | 3 | 0.50 | 61 | 62 | 10 | 1.00 | W2 | 31.60 |
8 | Sat | The Fab Five (Intel) | 2 | 4 | 0.33 | 53 | 57 | 11 | 1.58 | W1 | 30.26 |
9 | Sat | Beast Node (Intel) | 2 | 4 | 0.33 | 59 | 63 | 16 | 1.58 | L2 | 30.17 |
10 | Sat | Chip City (Intel) | 2 | 4 | 0.33 | 62 | 65 | 22 | 1.58 | W1 | 30.13 |
11 | Sat | Hoop De Hoop (Intel) | 1 | 5 | 0.17 | 48 | 62 | 18 | 1.42 | L3 | 27.60 |
Legal Guarding position (1 min) Legal defensive position is that you are square (in front of) opponent prior to their final step of the move/shot. After the 'moment' of being in front and in 'legal guarding position'- you can be moving backward and/or jumping up and contact should be legal, as seen in this video; in fact, if you are in front and displaced, it can be a charge call. |
Incidental contact (21 sec) This play could have been a no-call as the contact seems very incidental ('incidental' meaning- the contact did not create an unfair advantage for the person being contacted). This video seems to show a defender flopping, not a defender displaced by contact and therefore this could just as easily be a 'no-call' from the referee as the contact was incidental. |
Incidental contact (26sec) example 2 Defense gets to position prior to final step of offensive player- thus, the contact is going to be a no call or an offensive foul (offensive foul if the offensive player then displaces/dislodges the defender). |
No Call - On a Shot (40 sec) This is a no-call because the defense is there. Restated - contact is legal if the defense is there first. |
No Call - On a Shot (1 min) example 2 This could be a no-call as the contact is not creating a disadvantage and trained referees know that a foul requires three things: 1) illegal position with 2) contact and 3) a disadvantage created and as the ball goes in pretty easily in this video, it kind of makes the argument that there was not really a disadvantage created. |
Block/Charge? (36 sec) Defense gets to position prior to final step of offensive player- thus, the contact is going to be a no call or an offensive foul (offensive foul if the offensive player then displaces/dislodges the defender). |
Block/Charge? (1 min) example 2 This looks like a good call (a defensive foul). Plus if you think about it- a defender really should be 'defending'- not setting up for flops. A defender is a player trying to legally impede an offensive player from scoring- but the guy in the video is not trying to prevent scoring as much as he is trying to 'work the referees'. |
Various Examples of Foul Calls (6 minutes) PortlandBasketball.Com encourages players and referees to watch this video. There are 10 explanations of fouls vs 'no calls' vs charges in this training video. |
Law of Verticality (1 minute) If defender gets "in front of" an offensive player prior to that offensive player's final step of his move/shot, than that defender is entitled to (law of verticality) to the space behind him and 'to the ceiling'; in other words the defender can jump straight up (but- proof of jumping straight up- is that defender landed close to the same spot on floor when coming down). Important- for safety- to understand this concept of jumping straight up as opposed to jumping outward. |
Law of Verticality (6 minutes) explanation All players in PortlandBasketball.com, for safety reasons, need to watch this video explanation of the law of verticality and how it relates to safety- thank you. |
2016 Verticality Rule |
2016 Definition of a Foul &/or a No-Call |